At exactly the same time, regardless if sex variations was indeed questioned, i discovered no differences when considering males and females


At exactly the same time, regardless if sex variations was indeed questioned, i discovered no differences when considering males and females

Even when our analyses pick a good fit to the study, we tested if or not other design you will definitely match the data just as well or ideal (MacCallum, Wegener, Uchino, & Fabrigar, 1993). Profile dos presents that it inversed causation solution model lower than.

An option exploratory architectural model: What if sexual prejudice predicts correspondence and confident event that have homosexuals, understood resemblance having peers’ thinking into the homosexuality, and you may religiosity. All strong traces portray statistically high paths on .05 height. Magnitudes regarding organization try presented with the standard mistakes inside the parentheses; X 2 (61, Letter = 360) = . Normed (NFI), non-normed (NNFI), and you may comparative (CFI) goodness-of-fit is actually .91, .91, .93, respectively; RMSEA are .09.

Technically, it is only as the possible that people which have greater negative attitudes on homosexuality manage avoid interacting with homosexual boys and you will lesbians, score the interactions as the negative, perceiving their friends because the with various other perceptions into the gay people, otherwise find encouragement about their thinking within religiosity

The newest option design had a great fit, [? dos (61, N = 360) = , p 2 =11%); positive feel which have homosexual boys and you can lesbians (?=-.fifty, se = .06, p dos =25%); perceived peer similarities in their attitudes towards the homosexuals (?=-.19, se = .08, p dos =4%); and you may, religiosity (?=.forty eight, se = .04, p 2 =23%). Significant correlations was in fact located with the disturbances off detected similarities that have peers’ thinking to the homosexuals and their earlier relations having homosexual people and you will lesbians (r=.18, se = .06, p dos =.11); 25% regarding participants’ positive event that have homosexual some body (Roentgen dos =.25); 4% away from fellow similarities that have gay folks (R 2 =.04); and you will 23% off religiosity (Roentgen dos =.23).

If you find yourself these email address details are distinguished, we opposed and that model suitable the information greatest by using the Design AIC and you will Model CAIC coefficients for non-nested design evaluations and every models’ match indices. The first model got a far greater fit (Design AIC=; Design CAIC=-; NFI = .92; NNFI = .92; CFI = .94; RMSEA = .08) compared to choice model (Design AIC = & CAIC=-; NFI = .91; NNFI = .91; CFI = .93; RMSEA = .09). The real difference inside fit over the several designs means our very own fresh model’s theoretical rationale matches the info most readily useful (Byrne, 1994).


We establish an architectural design to test whether or not relations and you can confident enjoy which have homosexuals, perceived similarities having peers’ perceptions to your homosexuality, and you will religiosity have been predictive away from intimate bias one of an inhabitants off Puerto Rican young adults. The results suggest most of the latent variables, apart from peers’ attitudes on the homosexuality, predicted participants’ intimate prejudice on homosexual everyone. While you are early in the day scientists found sexual bias could be higher for males than just people (Kite, 1992; Herek, 2000b), we had been unable to simulate such abilities.

What number of gay persons known of the participants reduced its claimed intimate prejudice towards the gay folk. That it interested in means that Puerto Rican youth’s intimate prejudice could be dependent on the deficiency of connection with gays and you will lesbians. The newest stigmatization out of gay visitors in the Puerto Rican neighborhood may restriction some students’ exposure to gay men and lesbians. Inside society, taking inside-group panels with homosexual men and you can lesbians, instance, may assists students’ relations with gay men and lesbians. Other boffins discovered this type of class room facts drop-off some heterosexual’s bad appraisals into gay boys and you can lesbians (Sakalli & Ugurlu, 2001).

Our very own findings and additionally advise that participants’ positive enjoy having gay boys and you may lesbians use an affect within intimate bias on gay anyone. Participants’ remember out-of confident enjoy that have gay people and you can lesbians is actually firmly predictive of the intimate prejudice. Additionally, the presence of a positive relationship ranging from participants’ interactions with homosexuals as well as their recollection away from self-confident experiences with this particular category ways a keen iterative processes by which Puerto Rican young people you will definitely increase otherwise drop off the intent to activate with homosexual visitors in the later on moments. These results advise that Puerto Rican more youthful adults’ appraisals of the experience of homosexual folks are particularly important inside the structure and you may implementation of circumstances to reduce sexual bias. Things and you will settings promoting an atmosphere in which anticipate and you can unlock dialogue was stabilized get assists confident interchanges. Browse on which constitutes positive experience anywhere between Puerto Rican heterosexual and you will gay anyone required.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Website này sử dụng Akismet để hạn chế spam. Tìm hiểu bình luận của bạn được duyệt như thế nào.