With regards to aspect out-of personal envy, about 40 thinking-statement tools was in fact stated due to the fact creation of the newest Care about-Report and you can Projective Jealousy Balances (Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979). Of many devices were used only when. , 1992) created to assess intercourse variations; new Multidimensional Jealousy Measure (Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989) made to evaluate the about three proportions of envy (intellectual, psychological and you may behavioural dimensions); this new Fb Jealousy Level (Muise, Christofides, & Des) geared towards researching the possibilities of a meeting that creates ideas off jealousy players regarding its hobby on Myspace; the latest Envy Level (Buunk, 1997), always evaluate about three brand of envy (reactive, stressed and you may preventive) plus the Interpersonal Jealousy Measure (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981), and this evaluates brand new bad feelings due to real otherwise endangered loss regarding a liked individual an opponent.
Into the Brazil, the latest Romantic Jealousy List was changed (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) In terms of Colombia, there are not any psychometric education regarding a particular scale on romantic envy
From the Latin american perspective, discover a type inside the Chile of your Collection off Habits of your own Couples That can cause Jealousy (Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014). For the Mexico, an excellent Multidimensional Measure of Envy (Diaz-Enjoying, Rivera, & Flores, 1989) could have been elaborated and you can an initial investigation are finished with the latest Multidimensional List out-of Personal Jealousy (Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016). As well, prior education didn’t create Factorial Confirmatory Analysis (CFA) to be able to corroborate the foundation framework discover, and you may lower accuracy levels had been found in their points (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) or quick trials were utilized (Mota ainsi que al., 2016).
The new IJS put up for Mathes and Severa (1981) is one of the most put balances to have comparing personal jealousy, they receive six things one measure the susceptibility to help you risks relevant to: (a) Lover’s infidelity and you may matchmaking someone else (products step one, step 3, 12, fourteen, fifteen, 16, 20, twenty-two, 23, and you will 25); (b) Lover’s dominance (facts 2, step 3, cuatro, 7, ten, thirteen, 17, 20, and you can 23); (c) An enthusiastic untrustworthy lover (facts step one, 4, six, 19, and you can 21); (d) Partner’s old times (circumstances 11, twenty four, twenty-six, 27, and twenty-eight); (e) Lover’s indifference (products 8, 9 and twenty four); and you will (f) Partner’s left loved ones that have dated times and you will gender variations (products 5 and 18).
All products in the list above have demostrated enough amounts of legitimacy and you may accuracy
You’ll find four studies with checked out with regards to their reliability and you may legitimacy. Mathes and Severa (1981) establish one or two education, and earliest investigation did the building of one’s scale which have 39 things, that has been shorter in order to twenty-eight points after analytical investigation. Then, inside a second studies, IJS was used alongside almost every other scales one examined personal like-hyperlinks, insecurity, self-regard and a random questionnaire out of separate identities, confirming, according to concept, that the sophisticated regarding jealousy, the greater the amount of Personal love while the minimal the brand new separate term of your own pair. In this investigation, we statement a great coefficient from precision away from .ninety-five into complete level. When you look at the a third research, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and you can Knob (1982), in order to continue the new indicators of validity, used the IJS as well as 2 behavioral steps: (a) risk when confronted with a competitor and (b) phrases off possessiveness to the mate, as a result of a telephone call which they designed to the one who took part in the study. This new requested correlations was basically acquired, and therefore once again supported the newest validity of one’s size. In the long run, for the a 4th investigation, Mathes, Roter and you may Joerger (1982) substantiated the new convergent authenticity out of IJS along with other bills that evaluated intimate jealousy.